DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Nissan Frontier vs 1999 Chevrolet Alero Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Frontier

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

65.5–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeChevrolet
FrontierModelAlero
2000Model year1999
Pick-upBody typeSedan
4Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,5 s
0 km/hTop speed201 km/h
3275 ccEngine displacement3350 cc
170 HPPower177 HP
271 NmTorque271 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
73 ltFuel tank57 lt
15,6 ltUrban consumption15,2 lt
12,3 ltExtra-urban consumption8,6 lt
—Average consumption10,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears4
235/70 R15; 265/70 R15Tyre size215/60 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4981 mmLength4740 mm
1689 mmWidth1780 mm
1590 mmHeight1400 mm
—Weight1485 Kg
2649 mmWheelbase2720 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Nissan Frontier and 1999 Chevrolet Alero approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Frontier leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…