DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Holden Frontera vs 2000 Nissan Frontier Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Holden Frontera

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

66.25–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HoldenMakeNissan
FronteraModelFrontier
2000Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typePick-up
5Seats4
5Doors2

Performance

9,0 s0–100 km/h—
192 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3165 ccEngine displacement3275 cc
205 HPPower170 HP
290 NmTorque271 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank73 lt
17 ltUrban consumption15,6 lt
10,1 ltExtra-urban consumption12,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears4
—Tyre size235/70 R15; 265/70 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

4680 mmLength4981 mm
1785 mmWidth1689 mm
1690 mmHeight1590 mm
1785 KgWeight—
2700 mmWheelbase2649 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Holden Frontera and 2000 Nissan Frontier approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Holden Frontera leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…