DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Nissan Frontier vs 2000 Holden Frontera Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Holden Frontera

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.5–66.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeHolden
FrontierModelFrontera
2000Model year2000
Pick-upBody typeOff-road vehicle
4Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,0 s
0 km/hTop speed192 km/h
3275 ccEngine displacement3165 cc
170 HPPower205 HP
271 NmTorque290 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
73 ltFuel tank80 lt
15,6 ltUrban consumption17 lt
12,3 ltExtra-urban consumption10,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
4Gears5
235/70 R15; 265/70 R15Tyre size—
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4981 mmLength4680 mm
1689 mmWidth1785 mm
1590 mmHeight1690 mm
—Weight1785 Kg
2649 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Nissan Frontier and 2000 Holden Frontera approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Holden Frontera leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…