DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Nissan Frontier vs 2009 Volvo S80 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Frontier

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeVolvo
FrontierModelS80
2009Model year2009
Pick-upBody typeSedan
5Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,5 s
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2488 ccEngine displacement2400 cc
154 HPPower175 HP
231 NmTorque420 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
80 ltFuel tank70 lt
12,3 ltUrban consumption9,2 lt
10,2 ltExtra-urban consumption5,1 lt
—Average consumption6,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
235/75 R15; 265/70 R16; 265/75 R16; 265/65 R17Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5220 mmLength4851 mm
1850 mmWidth1861 mm
1879 mmHeight1493 mm
—Weight1647 Kg
3200 mmWheelbase2835 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Nissan Frontier and 2009 Volvo S80 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Frontier leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…