DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Volvo XC70 vs 2009 Nissan Frontier Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Frontier

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeNissan
XC70ModelFrontier
2009Model year2009
EstateBody typePick-up
5Seats5
5Doors2

Performance

9,6 s0–100 km/h—
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2400 ccEngine displacement2488 cc
175 HPPower154 HP
420 NmTorque231 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank80 lt
8,0 ltUrban consumption12,3 lt
4,9 ltExtra-urban consumption10,2 lt
6,0 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
—Gears5
—Tyre size235/75 R15; 265/70 R16; 265/75 R16; 265/65 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4838 mmLength5220 mm
1861 mmWidth1850 mm
1604 mmHeight1879 mm
1742 KgWeight—
2815 mmWheelbase3200 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Volvo XC70 and 2009 Nissan Frontier approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Frontier leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…