2009 • Nissan
Frontier
Nissan Frontier 2.5 (152 Hp) 2009Overall Score68.5/100
2009 Nissan Frontier vs 2009 Ford Ranger Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2009 • Ford
Ranger
Ford Ranger 2.5 TDCi (143 Hp) 2009Overall Score67.75/100
WINNER
Nissan Frontier
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Nissan FrontierSpecificationFord Ranger
NissanMakeFord
FrontierModelRanger
2009Model year2009
Pick-upBody typePick-up
4Seats5
2Doors4
Performance
Nissan FrontierSpecificationFord Ranger
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2488 ccEngine displacement2499 cc
152 HPPower143 HP
231 NmTorque330 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Nissan FrontierSpecificationFord Ranger
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
80 ltFuel tank70 lt
14,7 ltUrban consumption—
11,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Nissan FrontierSpecificationFord Ranger
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
265/70 R16; 265/75 R16Tyre size235/75 R15; 245/70 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Nissan FrontierSpecificationFord Ranger
5220 mmLength5075 mm
1850 mmWidth1805 mm
1770 mmHeight1745 mm
1682 KgWeight—
3200 mmWheelbase3000 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2009 Nissan Frontier and 2009 Ford Ranger approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Nissan Frontier leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…