2009 • Ford
Ranger
Ford Ranger 2.5 TDCi (143 Hp) 2009Overall Score67.75/100
2009 Ford Ranger vs 2009 Nissan Frontier Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2009 • Nissan
Frontier
Nissan Frontier 2.5 (152 Hp) 2009Overall Score68.5/100
WINNER
Nissan Frontier
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford RangerSpecificationNissan Frontier
FordMakeNissan
RangerModelFrontier
2009Model year2009
Pick-upBody typePick-up
5Seats4
4Doors2
Performance
Ford RangerSpecificationNissan Frontier
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2499 ccEngine displacement2488 cc
143 HPPower152 HP
330 NmTorque231 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford RangerSpecificationNissan Frontier
DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank80 lt
—Urban consumption14,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption11,7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford RangerSpecificationNissan Frontier
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
235/75 R15; 245/70 R16Tyre size265/70 R16; 265/75 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford RangerSpecificationNissan Frontier
5075 mmLength5220 mm
1805 mmWidth1850 mm
1745 mmHeight1770 mm
—Weight1682 Kg
3000 mmWheelbase3200 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2009 Ford Ranger and 2009 Nissan Frontier approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Nissan Frontier leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…