2003 • Nissan
Cube
Nissan Cube 1.5 (109Hp) 2003Overall Score56.5/100
2003 Nissan Cube vs 2003 Toyota Raum Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Toyota
Raum
Toyota Raum 1.5 i 16V (94 Hp) 2003Overall Score56.25/100
WINNER
Nissan Cube
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
56.5–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Nissan CubeSpecificationToyota Raum
NissanMakeToyota
CubeModelRaum
2003Model year2003
EstateBody typeMinivan
—Seats5
—Doors5
Performance
Nissan CubeSpecificationToyota Raum
0 km/hTop speed170 km/h
1498 ccEngine displacement1496 cc
109 HPPower94 HP
148 NmTorque132 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Nissan CubeSpecificationToyota Raum
PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank45 lt
—Urban consumption11 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Nissan CubeSpecificationToyota Raum
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears4
175/65 R14Tyre size175/65 R14 S
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Nissan CubeSpecificationToyota Raum
3900 mmLength4045 mm
1670 mmWidth1685 mm
1645 mmHeight1535 mm
1060 KgWeight1090 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase2520 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Nissan Cube and 2003 Toyota Raum approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Nissan Cube leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…