DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Nissan Cima vs 2003 Volkswagen Passat Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volkswagen Passat

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

78.75–79.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeVolkswagen
CimaModelPassat
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h6,5 s
0 km/hTop speed250 km/h
4491 ccEngine displacement3999 cc
280 HPPower275 HP
402 NmTorque370 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank80 lt
—Urban consumption19,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9,5 lt
12,2 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
4Gears6
225/60 R16 HTyre size225/45 R17 W
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4995 mmLength4703 mm
1845 mmWidth1746 mm
1505 mmHeight1461 mm
1850 KgWeight1665 Kg
2870 mmWheelbase2703 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Nissan Cima and 2003 Volkswagen Passat approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volkswagen Passat leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…