DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 GMC Yukon vs 2003 Nissan Cima Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

GMC Yukon

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

79.5–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

GMCMakeNissan
YukonModelCima
2003Model year2003
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

156 km/hTop speed0 km/h
4807 ccEngine displacement4491 cc
278 HPPower280 HP
393 NmTorque402 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
98 ltFuel tank80 lt
16,8 ltUrban consumption—
13,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption12,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
4Gears4
245/75 R16Tyre size225/60 R16 H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5029 mmLength4995 mm
2004 mmWidth1845 mm
1943 mmHeight1505 mm
2350 KgWeight1850 Kg
2946 mmWheelbase2870 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 GMC Yukon and 2003 Nissan Cima approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, GMC Yukon leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…