DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Nissan Cima vs 2003 GMC Yukon Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

GMC Yukon

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

78.75–79.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeGMC
CimaModelYukon
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

0 km/hTop speed156 km/h
4491 ccEngine displacement4807 cc
280 HPPower278 HP
402 NmTorque393 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank98 lt
—Urban consumption16,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption13,1 lt
12,2 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
4Gears4
225/60 R16 HTyre size245/75 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4995 mmLength5029 mm
1845 mmWidth2004 mm
1505 mmHeight1943 mm
1850 KgWeight2350 Kg
2870 mmWheelbase2946 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Nissan Cima and 2003 GMC Yukon approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, GMC Yukon leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…