DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Nissan Cima vs 2005 Audi A6 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Cima

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

84.75–83.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Nissan CimaSpecificationAudi A6
NissanMakeAudi
CimaModelA6
2004Model year2005
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

Nissan CimaSpecificationAudi A6
—0–100 km/h7,2 s
230 km/hTop speed240 km/h
4494 ccEngine displacement4163 cc
280 HPPower300 HP
451 NmTorque380 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

Nissan CimaSpecificationAudi A6
PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank70 lt
—Urban consumption20,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption10,2 lt
10 ltAverage consumption13,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Nissan CimaSpecificationAudi A6
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears5 Tiptronic
225/60 R16Tyre size245/45 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Nissan CimaSpecificationAudi A6
4970 mmLength4810 mm
1820 mmWidth1852 mm
1450 mmHeight1551 mm
1770 KgWeight1860 Kg
2830 mmWheelbase2757 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Nissan Cima and 2005 Audi A6 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Cima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…