DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 BMW X5 vs 2004 Nissan Cima Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Cima

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

83.75–84.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMW X5SpecificationNissan Cima
BMWMakeNissan
X5ModelCima
2003Model year2004
SUVBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

BMW X5SpecificationNissan Cima
7,5 s0–100 km/h—
210 km/hTop speed230 km/h
4398 ccEngine displacement4494 cc
286 HPPower280 HP
440 NmTorque451 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

BMW X5SpecificationNissan Cima
PetrolFuel typePetrol
92 ltFuel tank80 lt
18,8 ltUrban consumption—
11,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
13,9 ltAverage consumption10 lt

Transmission & Chassis

BMW X5SpecificationNissan Cima
4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
225/55 R18; 255/50 R19; 285/45 R19Tyre size225/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

BMW X5SpecificationNissan Cima
4666 mmLength4970 mm
1872 mmWidth1820 mm
1717 mmHeight1450 mm
2085 KgWeight1770 Kg
2820 mmWheelbase2830 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 BMW X5 and 2004 Nissan Cima approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Cima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…