DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Nissan Cima vs 2005 MG ZT Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZT

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

84.75–85.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Nissan CimaSpecificationMG ZT
NissanMakeMG
CimaModelZT
2004Model year2005
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats4
4Doors4

Performance

Nissan CimaSpecificationMG ZT
—0–100 km/h6,5 s
230 km/hTop speed250 km/h
4494 ccEngine displacement4601 cc
280 HPPower260 HP
451 NmTorque410 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

Nissan CimaSpecificationMG ZT
PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank65 lt
—Urban consumption17,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption10,4 lt
10 ltAverage consumption13,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Nissan CimaSpecificationMG ZT
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
225/60 R16Tyre size245/40 R18; 275/35 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Nissan CimaSpecificationMG ZT
4970 mmLength4740 mm
1820 mmWidth1780 mm
1450 mmHeight1430 mm
1770 KgWeight1595 Kg
2830 mmWheelbase2750 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Nissan Cima and 2005 MG ZT approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZT leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…