DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Nissan Cima vs 2003 BMW X5 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Cima

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

84.75–83.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Nissan CimaSpecificationBMW X5
NissanMakeBMW
CimaModelX5
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

Nissan CimaSpecificationBMW X5
—0–100 km/h6,5 s
230 km/hTop speed240 km/h
4494 ccEngine displacement4619 cc
280 HPPower347 HP
451 NmTorque480 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

Nissan CimaSpecificationBMW X5
PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank93 lt
—Urban consumption21,0 lt
—Extra-urban consumption11,4 lt
10 ltAverage consumption14,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Nissan CimaSpecificationBMW X5
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears5
225/60 R16Tyre size275/40 R20; 315/35 R20
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Nissan CimaSpecificationBMW X5
4970 mmLength4666 mm
1820 mmWidth1872 mm
1450 mmHeight1717 mm
1770 KgWeight2105 Kg
2830 mmWheelbase2820 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Nissan Cima and 2003 BMW X5 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Cima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…