DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 TVR Chimaera vs 2003 Nissan Cima Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

TVR Chimaera

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

85.5–84.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

TVRMakeNissan
ChimaeraModelCima
2003Model year2003
RoadsterBody typeSedan
2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

4,4 s0–100 km/h—
253 km/hTop speed230 km/h
4275 ccEngine displacement4494 cc
280 HPPower280 HP
398 NmTorque451 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
57 ltFuel tank80 lt
18 ltUrban consumption—
10 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption10 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
205/55 R16; 225/50 R16Tyre size225/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3965 mmLength4970 mm
1730 mmWidth1820 mm
1223 mmHeight1450 mm
1060 KgWeight1770 Kg
2282 mmWheelbase2830 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 TVR Chimaera and 2003 Nissan Cima approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, TVR Chimaera leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…