DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Nissan Cima vs 2004 Chrysler Crossfire Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chrysler Crossfire

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

81.75–82.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeChrysler
CimaModelCrossfire
2004Model year2004
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats2
4Doors2

Performance

—0–100 km/h5,3 s
230 km/hTop speed255 km/h
2988 ccEngine displacement3199 cc
280 HPPower330 HP
387 NmTorque420 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption13,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9,4 lt
11 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
225/55 R17Tyre size225/40 R18; 255/35 R19
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4970 mmLength4058 mm
1820 mmWidth1766 mm
1450 mmHeight1296 mm
1670 KgWeight1455 Kg
2830 mmWheelbase2400 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Nissan Cima and 2004 Chrysler Crossfire approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chrysler Crossfire leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…