DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Nissan Cima vs 2000 Nissan Gloria Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Gloria

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

75.75–76.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeNissan
CimaModelGloria
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

0 km/hTop speed220 km/h
2960 ccEngine displacement2987 cc
255 HPPower240 HP
343 NmTorque309 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank80 lt
—Urban consumption16 lt
—Extra-urban consumption10 lt
9,2 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears4
215/65 R15 HTyre size215/55 R16 V
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4945 mmLength4865 mm
1780 mmWidth1770 mm
1435 mmHeight1440 mm
1660 KgWeight1600 Kg
2815 mmWheelbase2800 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Nissan Cima and 2000 Nissan Gloria approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Gloria leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…