1999 • Alpina
D10
Alpina D10 2.9 D Biturbo (245 Hp) 1999Overall Score76.5/100
1999 Alpina D10 vs 2000 Nissan Cima Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Nissan
Cima
Nissan Cima 3.0 i V6 24V Turbo (255 Hp) 2000Overall Score75.75/100
WINNER
Alpina D10
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
76.5–75.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Alpina D10SpecificationNissan Cima
AlpinaMakeNissan
D10ModelCima
1999Model year2000
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Alpina D10SpecificationNissan Cima
7,2 s0–100 km/h—
254 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2926 ccEngine displacement2960 cc
245 HPPower255 HP
500 NmTorque343 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Alpina D10SpecificationNissan Cima
DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank80 lt
9,9 ltUrban consumption—
6,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,7 ltAverage consumption9,2 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Alpina D10SpecificationNissan Cima
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears4
235/40 ZR 18; 265/35 ZR 18Tyre size215/65 R15 H
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Alpina D10SpecificationNissan Cima
4775 mmLength4945 mm
1800 mmWidth1780 mm
1415 mmHeight1435 mm
1625 KgWeight1660 Kg
2830 mmWheelbase2815 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1999 Alpina D10 and 2000 Nissan Cima approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Alpina D10 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…