DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Nissan Cima vs 1997 Honda NSX Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Honda NSX

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points.

75.75–76.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeHonda
CimaModelNSX
2000Model year1997
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats2
4Doors2

Performance

—0–100 km/h7,5 s
0 km/hTop speed260 km/h
2960 ccEngine displacement2977 cc
255 HPPower256 HP
343 NmTorque284 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank70 lt
—Urban consumption17,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,7 lt
9,2 ltAverage consumption10,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears4
215/65 R15 HTyre size215/45 R17; 245/40 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4945 mmLength4425 mm
1780 mmWidth1810 mm
1435 mmHeight1170 mm
1660 KgWeight1430 Kg
2815 mmWheelbase2530 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Nissan Cima and 1997 Honda NSX approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Honda NSX leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…