DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Nissan Cima vs 1999 Alpina D10 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alpina D10

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

75.75–76.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeAlpina
CimaModelD10
2000Model year1999
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h7,2 s
0 km/hTop speed254 km/h
2960 ccEngine displacement2926 cc
255 HPPower245 HP
343 NmTorque500 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
80 ltFuel tank70 lt
—Urban consumption9,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,1 lt
9,2 ltAverage consumption7,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears6
215/65 R15 HTyre size235/40 ZR 18; 265/35 ZR 18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4945 mmLength4775 mm
1780 mmWidth1800 mm
1435 mmHeight1415 mm
1660 KgWeight1625 Kg
2815 mmWheelbase2830 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Nissan Cima and 1999 Alpina D10 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alpina D10 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…