2000 • Nissan
Cedric
Nissan Cedric 3.0i V6 (160 Hp) 2000Overall Score60.25/100
2000 Nissan Cedric vs 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Jeep
Grand Cherokee
Jeep Grand Cherokee 3.1 TD (140 Hp) 2000Overall Score59.5/100
WINNER
Nissan Cedric
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Nissan CedricSpecificationJeep Grand Cherokee
NissanMakeJeep
CedricModelGrand Cherokee
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Nissan CedricSpecificationJeep Grand Cherokee
10,6 s0–100 km/h14,0 s
190 km/hTop speed173 km/h
2960 ccEngine displacement3125 cc
160 HPPower140 HP
248 NmTorque384 Nm
6Cylinders5
Fuel & Consumption
Nissan CedricSpecificationJeep Grand Cherokee
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
72 ltFuel tank78 lt
13,2 ltUrban consumption14,5 lt
8,5 ltExtra-urban consumption9,7 lt
11,8 ltAverage consumption11,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Nissan CedricSpecificationJeep Grand Cherokee
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears5
195/70 R14Tyre size245/70 R16
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Nissan CedricSpecificationJeep Grand Cherokee
4690 mmLength4610 mm
1690 mmWidth1839 mm
1425 mmHeight1762 mm
1520 KgWeight1856 Kg
2735 mmWheelbase2691 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Nissan Cedric and 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Nissan Cedric leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…