1999 • Ford
Windstar
Ford Windstar 3.0 V6 (152 Hp) 1999Overall Score59.25/100
1999 Ford Windstar vs 2000 Nissan Cedric Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Nissan
Cedric
Nissan Cedric 3.0i V6 (160 Hp) 2000Overall Score60.25/100
WINNER
Nissan Cedric
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
59.25–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford WindstarSpecificationNissan Cedric
FordMakeNissan
WindstarModelCedric
1999Model year2000
MinivanBody typeSedan
7Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Ford WindstarSpecificationNissan Cedric
13,5 s0–100 km/h10,6 s
180 km/hTop speed190 km/h
2986 ccEngine displacement2960 cc
152 HPPower160 HP
252 NmTorque248 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Ford WindstarSpecificationNissan Cedric
PetrolFuel typePetrol
95 ltFuel tank72 lt
15,4 ltUrban consumption13,2 lt
8,5 ltExtra-urban consumption8,5 lt
—Average consumption11,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford WindstarSpecificationNissan Cedric
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears4
205/75 R15Tyre size195/70 R14
YesABS—
Dimensions
Ford WindstarSpecificationNissan Cedric
5125 mmLength4690 mm
1915 mmWidth1690 mm
1790 mmHeight1425 mm
1810 KgWeight1520 Kg
3066 mmWheelbase2735 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1999 Ford Windstar and 2000 Nissan Cedric approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Nissan Cedric leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…