2000 • Nissan
Cedric
Nissan Cedric 3.0i V6 (160 Hp) 2000Overall Score60.25/100
2000 Nissan Cedric vs 1999 Ford Windstar Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1999 • Ford
Windstar
Ford Windstar 3.0 V6 (152 Hp) 1999Overall Score59.25/100
WINNER
Nissan Cedric
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
60.25–59.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Nissan CedricSpecificationFord Windstar
NissanMakeFord
CedricModelWindstar
2000Model year1999
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats7
4Doors4
Performance
Nissan CedricSpecificationFord Windstar
10,6 s0–100 km/h13,5 s
190 km/hTop speed180 km/h
2960 ccEngine displacement2986 cc
160 HPPower152 HP
248 NmTorque252 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Nissan CedricSpecificationFord Windstar
PetrolFuel typePetrol
72 ltFuel tank95 lt
13,2 ltUrban consumption15,4 lt
8,5 ltExtra-urban consumption8,5 lt
11,8 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Nissan CedricSpecificationFord Windstar
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears4
195/70 R14Tyre size205/75 R15
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Nissan CedricSpecificationFord Windstar
4690 mmLength5125 mm
1690 mmWidth1915 mm
1425 mmHeight1790 mm
1520 KgWeight1810 Kg
2735 mmWheelbase3066 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Nissan Cedric and 1999 Ford Windstar approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Nissan Cedric leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…