1999 • Nissan
Cedric
Nissan Cedric 3.0i V6 (160 Hp) 1999Overall Score59.25/100
1999 Nissan Cedric vs 2000 Mitsubishi Montero Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Mitsubishi
Montero
Mitsubishi Montero 3.0 i V6 24V (170 Hp) 2000Overall Score60.25/100
WINNER
Mitsubishi Montero
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
59.25–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Nissan CedricSpecificationMitsubishi Montero
NissanMakeMitsubishi
CedricModelMontero
1999Model year2000
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Nissan CedricSpecificationMitsubishi Montero
10,6 s0–100 km/h11,6 s
190 km/hTop speed175 km/h
2960 ccEngine displacement2972 cc
160 HPPower170 HP
248 NmTorque255 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Nissan CedricSpecificationMitsubishi Montero
PetrolFuel typePetrol
72 ltFuel tank74 lt
13,2 ltUrban consumption16,6 lt
8,5 ltExtra-urban consumption9,9 lt
11,8 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Nissan CedricSpecificationMitsubishi Montero
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears5
195/70 R14Tyre size255/70 R16
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Nissan CedricSpecificationMitsubishi Montero
4690 mmLength4610 mm
1690 mmWidth1775 mm
1425 mmHeight1735 mm
1520 KgWeight1920 Kg
2735 mmWheelbase2725 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1999 Nissan Cedric and 2000 Mitsubishi Montero approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mitsubishi Montero leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…