DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mitsubishi Montero vs 1999 Nissan Cedric Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Montero

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

60.25–59.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeNissan
MonteroModelCedric
2000Model year1999
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

11,6 s0–100 km/h10,6 s
175 km/hTop speed190 km/h
2972 ccEngine displacement2960 cc
170 HPPower160 HP
255 NmTorque248 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
74 ltFuel tank72 lt
16,6 ltUrban consumption13,2 lt
9,9 ltExtra-urban consumption8,5 lt
—Average consumption11,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
255/70 R16Tyre size195/70 R14
YesABS—

Dimensions

4610 mmLength4690 mm
1775 mmWidth1690 mm
1735 mmHeight1425 mm
1920 KgWeight1520 Kg
2725 mmWheelbase2735 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mitsubishi Montero and 1999 Nissan Cedric approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Montero leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…