2000 • Nissan
Cedric
Nissan Cedric 3.0 i V6 24V (280 Hp) 2000Overall Score81.75/100
2000 Nissan Cedric vs 2000 Toyota Supra Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Toyota
Supra
Toyota Supra 3.0i 24V T-turbo (330 Hp) 2000Overall Score82.5/100
WINNER
Toyota Supra
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
81.75–82.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Nissan CedricSpecificationToyota Supra
NissanMakeToyota
CedricModelSupra
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats4
4Doors3
Performance
Nissan CedricSpecificationToyota Supra
—0–100 km/h5,1 s
220 km/hTop speed250 km/h
2987 ccEngine displacement2997 cc
280 HPPower330 HP
387 NmTorque440 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Nissan CedricSpecificationToyota Supra
PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank70 lt
18 ltUrban consumption14,6 lt
11 ltExtra-urban consumption10,3 lt
—Average consumption11,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Nissan CedricSpecificationToyota Supra
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears6
205/60 R16 HTyre size225/50 ZR16; 245/50 ZR16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Nissan CedricSpecificationToyota Supra
4860 mmLength4520 mm
1770 mmWidth1810 mm
1450 mmHeight1275 mm
1660 KgWeight1570 Kg
2800 mmWheelbase2500 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Nissan Cedric and 2000 Toyota Supra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Toyota Supra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…