DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1987 Nissan Cedric vs 1989 Audi 100 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi 100

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

49.25–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeAudi
CedricModel100
1987Model year1989
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

14,3 s0–100 km/h16,5 s
167 km/hTop speed166 km/h
2825 ccEngine displacement2370 cc
94 HPPower82 HP
177 NmTorque164 Nm
6Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
72 ltFuel tank80 lt
9,7 ltUrban consumption—
7,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,3 ltAverage consumption7,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/70 R14Tyre size185/70 R14

Dimensions

4690 mmLength4793 mm
1690 mmWidth1814 mm
1425 mmHeight1421 mm
1410 KgWeight1300 Kg
2735 mmWheelbase2687 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1987 Nissan Cedric and 1989 Audi 100 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi 100 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…