1996 • Nissan
Cedric
Nissan Cedric 2.8d (100 Hp) 1996Overall Score49.25/100
1996 Nissan Cedric vs 1996 Ford Maverick Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1996 • Ford
Maverick
Ford Maverick 2.7 TD (5 dr) 1996Overall Score48.5/100
WINNER
Nissan Cedric
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
49.25–48.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Nissan CedricSpecificationFord Maverick
NissanMakeFord
CedricModelMaverick
1996Model year1996
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Nissan CedricSpecificationFord Maverick
17,3 s0–100 km/h19,9 s
163 km/hTop speed145 km/h
2825 ccEngine displacement2663 cc
100 HPPower100 HP
178 NmTorque221 Nm
6Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Nissan CedricSpecificationFord Maverick
DieselFuel typeDiesel
80 ltFuel tank80 lt
12,9 ltAverage consumption10,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Nissan CedricSpecificationFord Maverick
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears5
205/65 R15Tyre size215/80 R15 R
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Nissan CedricSpecificationFord Maverick
—Length4585 mm
—Width1735 mm
—Height1810 mm
1560 KgWeight1850 Kg
—Wheelbase2650 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1996 Nissan Cedric and 1996 Ford Maverick approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Nissan Cedric leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSFord Maverick vs Nissan Cedric1996 and 1996 model years
VSNissan Mistral vs Nissan Cedric1996 and 1996 model years
VSNissan Terrano vs Nissan Cedric1996 and 1996 model years
VSOpel Frontera vs Nissan Cedric1996 and 1996 model yearsImage unavailableVSSsangYong Korando vs Nissan Cedric1996 and 1996 model yearsComments are loading…