1996 • Opel
Frontera
Opel Frontera 2.8 TD (113 Hp) 1996Overall Score48.5/100
1996 Opel Frontera vs 1996 Nissan Cedric Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1996 • Nissan
Cedric
Nissan Cedric 2.8d (100 Hp) 1996Overall Score49.25/100
WINNER
Nissan Cedric
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
48.5–49.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Opel FronteraSpecificationNissan Cedric
OpelMakeNissan
FronteraModelCedric
1996Model year1996
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3Doors4
Performance
Opel FronteraSpecificationNissan Cedric
16,8 s0–100 km/h17,3 s
149 km/hTop speed163 km/h
2771 ccEngine displacement2825 cc
113 HPPower100 HP
242 NmTorque178 Nm
4Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Opel FronteraSpecificationNissan Cedric
DieselFuel typeDiesel
80 ltFuel tank80 lt
16 ltUrban consumption—
8,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—
11 ltAverage consumption12,9 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Opel FronteraSpecificationNissan Cedric
4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
235/70 R16Tyre size205/65 R15
YesABS—
Dimensions
Opel FronteraSpecificationNissan Cedric
4192 mmLength—
1780 mmWidth—
1721 mmHeight—
1828 KgWeight1560 Kg
2330 mmWheelbase—
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1996 Opel Frontera and 1996 Nissan Cedric approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Nissan Cedric leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…