DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Nissan Cedric vs 2005 Jaguar XJ Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jaguar XJ

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

75.75–76.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeJaguar
CedricModelXJ
2004Model year2005
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

7,8 s0–100 km/h8,1 s
235 km/hTop speed233 km/h
2498 ccEngine displacement2967 cc
260 HPPower238 HP
324 NmTorque293 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank85 lt
—Urban consumption15,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,7 lt
12,5 ltAverage consumption10,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears6
205/60 R16Tyre size235/45 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4860 mmLength5090 mm
1770 mmWidth1860 mm
1465 mmHeight1448 mm
1710 KgWeight1545 Kg
2800 mmWheelbase3034 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Nissan Cedric and 2005 Jaguar XJ approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jaguar XJ leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…