DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Toyota Progres vs 2004 Nissan Cedric Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Cedric

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points.

75.25–75.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeNissan
ProgresModelCedric
2005Model year2004
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h7,8 s
180 km/hTop speed235 km/h
2492 ccEngine displacement2498 cc
200 HPPower260 HP
250 NmTorque324 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank80 lt
13 ltUrban consumption—
8 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption12,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears4
195/65 R15 HTyre size205/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4510 mmLength4860 mm
1700 mmWidth1770 mm
1435 mmHeight1465 mm
1520 KgWeight1710 Kg
2780 mmWheelbase2800 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Toyota Progres and 2004 Nissan Cedric approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Cedric leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…