DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Nissan Cedric vs 2005 Nissan Stagea Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Cedric

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points.

75.75–75.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeNissan
CedricModelStagea
2003Model year2005
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

7,8 s0–100 km/h—
235 km/hTop speed180 km/h
2498 ccEngine displacement2495 cc
260 HPPower215 HP
324 NmTorque270 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank80 lt
—Urban consumption15 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9 lt
12,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears4
205/60 R16Tyre size215/55 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4860 mmLength4765 mm
1770 mmWidth1760 mm
1465 mmHeight1510 mm
1710 KgWeight1550 Kg
2800 mmWheelbase2850 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Nissan Cedric and 2005 Nissan Stagea approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Cedric leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…