DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Nissan Stagea vs 2003 Nissan Cedric Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Cedric

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points.

75.25–75.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeNissan
StageaModelCedric
2005Model year2003
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h7,8 s
180 km/hTop speed235 km/h
2495 ccEngine displacement2498 cc
215 HPPower260 HP
270 NmTorque324 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank80 lt
15 ltUrban consumption—
9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption12,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears4
215/55 R17Tyre size205/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4765 mmLength4860 mm
1760 mmWidth1770 mm
1510 mmHeight1465 mm
1550 KgWeight1710 Kg
2850 mmWheelbase2800 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Nissan Stagea and 2003 Nissan Cedric approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Cedric leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…