DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Audi A6 vs 2005 Land Rover Range Rover Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi A6

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

87.5–86.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AudiMakeLand Rover
A6ModelRange Rover
2003Model year2005
EstateBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

6,9 s0–100 km/h9,2 s
250 km/hTop speed208 km/h
4172 ccEngine displacement4394 cc
300 HPPower299 HP
400 NmTorque425 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
82 ltFuel tank105 lt
19,4 ltUrban consumption21,2 lt
9,5 ltExtra-urban consumption11,4 lt
13,1 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5 TiptronicGears6
235/50 R16Tyre size225/60 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4833 mmLength4950 mm
1850 mmWidth1955 mm
1465 mmHeight1860 mm
1815 KgWeight2485 Kg
2759 mmWheelbase2880 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Audi A6 and 2005 Land Rover Range Rover approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi A6 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…