DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Land Rover Range Rover vs 2003 Audi A6 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi A6

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

86.75–87.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeAudi
Range RoverModelA6
2005Model year2003
Off-road vehicleBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

9,2 s0–100 km/h6,9 s
208 km/hTop speed250 km/h
4394 ccEngine displacement4172 cc
299 HPPower300 HP
425 NmTorque400 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
105 ltFuel tank82 lt
21,2 ltUrban consumption19,4 lt
11,4 ltExtra-urban consumption9,5 lt
—Average consumption13,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
6Gears5 Tiptronic
225/60 R18Tyre size235/50 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4950 mmLength4833 mm
1955 mmWidth1850 mm
1860 mmHeight1465 mm
2485 KgWeight1815 Kg
2880 mmWheelbase2759 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Land Rover Range Rover and 2003 Audi A6 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi A6 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…