DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mitsubishi Legnum vs 1999 Nissan Cedric Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Legnum

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

75.75–74.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeNissan
LegnumModelCedric
2000Model year1999
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h7,8 s
0 km/hTop speed235 km/h
2498 ccEngine displacement2498 cc
280 HPPower260 HP
363 NmTorque324 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank80 lt
—Average consumption12,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears4
225/50 R16VTyre size205/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4740 mmLength4860 mm
1760 mmWidth1770 mm
1470 mmHeight1465 mm
1550 KgWeight1710 Kg
2635 mmWheelbase2800 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mitsubishi Legnum and 1999 Nissan Cedric approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Legnum leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…