DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Nissan Cedric vs 2005 Jaguar S-type Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jaguar S-type

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

75.75–76.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeJaguar
CedricModelS-type
2003Model year2005
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

7,8 s0–100 km/h8,6 s
235 km/hTop speed228 km/h
2498 ccEngine displacement2497 cc
250 HPPower200 HP
319 NmTorque245 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank68 lt
—Urban consumption13,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,3 lt
12,1 ltAverage consumption9,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
205/60 R16Tyre size205/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4865 mmLength4861 mm
1770 mmWidth1819 mm
1465 mmHeight1441 mm
1720 KgWeight1620 Kg
2800 mmWheelbase2909 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Nissan Cedric and 2005 Jaguar S-type approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jaguar S-type leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…