DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Jaguar XJ vs 2003 Nissan Cedric Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jaguar XJ

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

76.5–75.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JaguarMakeNissan
XJModelCedric
2005Model year2003
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

8,1 s0–100 km/h7,8 s
233 km/hTop speed235 km/h
2967 ccEngine displacement2498 cc
238 HPPower250 HP
293 NmTorque319 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
85 ltFuel tank80 lt
15,3 ltUrban consumption—
7,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
10,5 ltAverage consumption12,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears4
235/45 R17Tyre size205/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5090 mmLength4865 mm
1860 mmWidth1770 mm
1448 mmHeight1465 mm
1545 KgWeight1720 Kg
3034 mmWheelbase2800 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Jaguar XJ and 2003 Nissan Cedric approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jaguar XJ leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…