DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Nissan Cedric vs 2003 Toyota Crown Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Cedric

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

74.5–73.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeToyota
CedricModelCrown
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

200 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2495 ccEngine displacement2491 cc
210 HPPower280 HP
265 NmTorque250 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank70 lt
14 ltUrban consumption—
9 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears4
205/65 R15 STyre size205/55 R16; 225/50 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4860 mmLength4820 mm
1770 mmWidth1765 mm
1450 mmHeight1455 mm
1600 KgWeight1600 Kg
2800 mmWheelbase2780 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Nissan Cedric and 2003 Toyota Crown approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Cedric leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…