DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Peugeot 607 vs 2003 Nissan Cedric Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Cedric

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

73.75–74.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

PeugeotMakeNissan
607ModelCedric
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

9,3 s0–100 km/h—
230 km/hTop speed200 km/h
2720 ccEngine displacement2495 cc
205 HPPower210 HP
440 NmTorque265 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank80 lt
11,6 ltUrban consumption14 lt
6,6 ltExtra-urban consumption9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears4
225/55 R17Tyre size205/65 R15 S
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4877 mmLength4860 mm
1800 mmWidth1770 mm
1437 mmHeight1450 mm
1730 KgWeight1600 Kg
2800 mmWheelbase2800 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Peugeot 607 and 2003 Nissan Cedric approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Cedric leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…