DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1990 Nissan Cedric vs 1990 Saab 9000 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Cedric

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.5–66.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeSaab
CedricModel9000
1990Model year1990
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

7,8 s0–100 km/h8,0 s
215 km/hTop speed230 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement2290 cc
210 HPPower195 HP
265 NmTorque323 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
72 ltFuel tank66 lt
13,4 ltUrban consumption12,5 lt
7,4 ltExtra-urban consumption7 lt
11,1 ltAverage consumption9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/65 R15Tyre size205/55 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4690 mmLength4794 mm
1720 mmWidth1764 mm
1425 mmHeight1420 mm
1550 KgWeight1335 Kg
2735 mmWheelbase2672 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1990 Nissan Cedric and 1990 Saab 9000 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Cedric leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…