1990 • Audi
Coupe
Audi Coupe 2.0 20V (160 Hp) 1990Overall Score66.5/100
1990 Audi Coupe vs 1990 Nissan Cedric Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1990 • Nissan
Cedric
Nissan Cedric 2.0i V6 (210 Hp) 1990Overall Score67.5/100
WINNER
Nissan Cedric
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
66.5–67.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Audi CoupeSpecificationNissan Cedric
AudiMakeNissan
CoupeModelCedric
1990Model year1990
CoupeBody typeSedan
5Seats5
2Doors4
Performance
Audi CoupeSpecificationNissan Cedric
8,5 s0–100 km/h7,8 s
240 km/hTop speed215 km/h
1994 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
160 HPPower210 HP
195 NmTorque265 Nm
5Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Audi CoupeSpecificationNissan Cedric
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank72 lt
12 ltUrban consumption13,4 lt
9 ltExtra-urban consumption7,4 lt
11 ltAverage consumption11,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Audi CoupeSpecificationNissan Cedric
4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/60 R15Tyre size205/65 R15
YesABS—
Dimensions
Audi CoupeSpecificationNissan Cedric
4366 mmLength4690 mm
1716 mmWidth1720 mm
1370 mmHeight1425 mm
1350 KgWeight1550 Kg
2550 mmWheelbase2735 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1990 Audi Coupe and 1990 Nissan Cedric approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Nissan Cedric leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…