DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1990 Nissan Cedric vs 1990 Audi Coupe Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Cedric

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

67.5–66.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeAudi
CedricModelCoupe
1990Model year1990
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats5
4Doors2

Performance

7,8 s0–100 km/h8,5 s
215 km/hTop speed240 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1994 cc
210 HPPower160 HP
265 NmTorque195 Nm
6Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
72 ltFuel tank70 lt
13,4 ltUrban consumption12 lt
7,4 ltExtra-urban consumption9 lt
11,1 ltAverage consumption11 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
205/65 R15Tyre size205/60 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4690 mmLength4366 mm
1720 mmWidth1716 mm
1425 mmHeight1370 mm
1550 KgWeight1350 Kg
2735 mmWheelbase2550 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1990 Nissan Cedric and 1990 Audi Coupe approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Cedric leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…