DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1990 Nissan Cedric vs 1990 Oldsmobile Cutlass Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Oldsmobile Cutlass

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.5–68.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeOldsmobile
CedricModelCutlass
1990Model year1990
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats5
4Doors2

Performance

7,8 s0–100 km/h—
215 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement2260 cc
210 HPPower162 HP
265 NmTorque210 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
72 ltFuel tank63 lt
13,4 ltUrban consumption16 lt
7,4 ltExtra-urban consumption9 lt
11,1 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears3
205/65 R15Tyre size195/75 R14 S
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4690 mmLength4900 mm
1720 mmWidth1805 mm
1425 mmHeight1350 mm
1550 KgWeight1445 Kg
2735 mmWheelbase2730 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1990 Nissan Cedric and 1990 Oldsmobile Cutlass approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Oldsmobile Cutlass leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…