1987 • Nissan
Cedric
Nissan Cedric 2.0i V6 (185 Hp) 1987Overall Score64.5/100
1987 Nissan Cedric vs 1987 Audi 90 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1987 • Audi
90
Audi 90 2.2 E (136 Hp) 1987Overall Score63.5/100
WINNER
Nissan Cedric
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
64.5–63.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Nissan CedricSpecificationAudi 90
NissanMakeAudi
CedricModel90
1987Model year1987
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Nissan CedricSpecificationAudi 90
9,5 s0–100 km/h8,9 s
203 km/hTop speed206 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement2226 cc
185 HPPower136 HP
216 NmTorque189 Nm
6Cylinders5
Fuel & Consumption
Nissan CedricSpecificationAudi 90
PetrolFuel typePetrol
72 ltFuel tank68 lt
12,2 ltUrban consumption11,8 lt
7,6 ltExtra-urban consumption6,3 lt
10,7 ltAverage consumption7,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Nissan CedricSpecificationAudi 90
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
205/65 R15Tyre size195/60 R14
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Nissan CedricSpecificationAudi 90
4690 mmLength4393 mm
1690 mmWidth1695 mm
1425 mmHeight1397 mm
1470 KgWeight1170 Kg
2735 mmWheelbase2546 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1987 Nissan Cedric and 1987 Audi 90 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Nissan Cedric leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…