1987 • Audi
100
Audi 100 2.2 (138 Hp) 1987Overall Score63.5/100
1987 Audi 100 vs 1987 Nissan Cedric Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1987 • Nissan
Cedric
Nissan Cedric 2.0i V6 (185 Hp) 1987Overall Score64.5/100
WINNER
Nissan Cedric
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
63.5–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Audi 100SpecificationNissan Cedric
AudiMakeNissan
100ModelCedric
1987Model year1987
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Audi 100SpecificationNissan Cedric
9,6 s0–100 km/h9,5 s
202 km/hTop speed203 km/h
2226 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
138 HPPower185 HP
188 NmTorque216 Nm
5Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Audi 100SpecificationNissan Cedric
PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank72 lt
—Urban consumption12,2 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,6 lt
9 ltAverage consumption10,7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Audi 100SpecificationNissan Cedric
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
185/70 R14Tyre size205/65 R15
Dimensions
Audi 100SpecificationNissan Cedric
4793 mmLength4690 mm
1814 mmWidth1690 mm
1422 mmHeight1425 mm
1250 KgWeight1470 Kg
2687 mmWheelbase2735 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1987 Audi 100 and 1987 Nissan Cedric approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Nissan Cedric leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…