1987 • Nissan
Cedric
Nissan Cedric 2.0i V6 (185 Hp) 1987Overall Score64.5/100
1987 Nissan Cedric vs 1987 Audi 100 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1987 • Audi
100
Audi 100 2.2 (138 Hp) 1987Overall Score63.5/100
WINNER
Nissan Cedric
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
64.5–63.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Nissan CedricSpecificationAudi 100
NissanMakeAudi
CedricModel100
1987Model year1987
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Nissan CedricSpecificationAudi 100
9,5 s0–100 km/h9,6 s
203 km/hTop speed202 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement2226 cc
185 HPPower138 HP
216 NmTorque188 Nm
6Cylinders5
Fuel & Consumption
Nissan CedricSpecificationAudi 100
PetrolFuel typePetrol
72 ltFuel tank80 lt
12,2 ltUrban consumption—
7,6 ltExtra-urban consumption—
10,7 ltAverage consumption9 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Nissan CedricSpecificationAudi 100
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
205/65 R15Tyre size185/70 R14
Dimensions
Nissan CedricSpecificationAudi 100
4690 mmLength4793 mm
1690 mmWidth1814 mm
1425 mmHeight1422 mm
1470 KgWeight1250 Kg
2735 mmWheelbase2687 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1987 Nissan Cedric and 1987 Audi 100 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Nissan Cedric leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…