DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1994 Nissan Cedric vs 1994 Chrysler Neon Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Cedric

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

53.25–52.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeChrysler
CedricModelNeon
1994Model year1994
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

11,5 s0–100 km/h8,8 s
184 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1996 cc
125 HPPower147 HP
167 NmTorque174 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
72 ltFuel tank42 lt
10,4 ltUrban consumption—
7,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,7 ltAverage consumption7,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size175/65 R14
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4690 mmLength4364 mm
1690 mmWidth1714 mm
1425 mmHeight1369 mm
1360 KgWeight—
2735 mmWheelbase2642 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1994 Nissan Cedric and 1994 Chrysler Neon approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Cedric leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…