DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1994 Alfa Romeo 146 vs 1994 Nissan Cedric Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Cedric

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

52.5–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Alfa RomeoMakeNissan
146ModelCedric
1994Model year1994
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

10,2 s0–100 km/h11,5 s
202 km/hTop speed184 km/h
1712 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
129 HPPower125 HP
148 NmTorque167 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
51 ltFuel tank72 lt
—Urban consumption10,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,2 lt
8,5 ltAverage consumption9,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60 R14Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

4257 mmLength4690 mm
1712 mmWidth1690 mm
1425 mmHeight1425 mm
1225 KgWeight1360 Kg
2540 mmWheelbase2735 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1994 Alfa Romeo 146 and 1994 Nissan Cedric approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Cedric leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…